← Latest news 
Intervenor tells MP High Court Bhojshala claims not maintainable under writ jurisdiction ownership
Politics
Published on 28 April 2026

Writ court cannot decide ownership claims, intervenor argues
A Muslim intervenor urged the Madhya Pradesh High Court to dismiss petitions over the Bhojshala monument, arguing they are not maintainable under writ jurisdiction. The intervenor said the dispute is fundamentally about ownership rights and therefore should be handled by civil courts, not through writ proceedings filed by Hindu parties.
- Intervenor argues Bhojshala petitions fail on maintainability grounds
- Ownership rights, not writ relief, should be decided by civil courts
- Dispute is framed as a civil matter rather than a writ issue
Read the full story at The Economic Times
This summarization was done by Beige for a story published on
The Economic Times
