A Bombay High Court ruling has protected policyholders whose health insurance claims were rejected only because documents were submitted after a 90-day deadline. In the case of C.P. Ravindranath Menon and his wife, United India Insurance refused reimbursement of ₹1.13 lakh for domiciliary and OPD-related expenses during the policy period. The court held that clauses extinguishing rights due to procedural delay are void under Section 28 of the Contract Act, ordering payment within eight weeks plus 6% interest. Insurers may appeal to the Supreme Court.
Health insurers are adding a “material change” clause that can let them revise premiums and policy terms at renewal. Experts warn it may clash with IRDAI rules meant to protect continuity and fair pricing. Policyholders are urged to read the fine print carefully, ask for written clarification, and understand how the clause could affect coverage going forward.
Your news, in seconds
Get the Beige app — every story in 60 words, updated hourly. Free on iOS & Android.
India’s insurance regulator has rolled out a common empanelment system that asks all general insurers to onboard hospitals together under standardized terms and rates. Modeled on PMJAY-style empanelment, it could reshape bargaining power, reduce billing variation, and pressure insurers’ hospital costs. But the real impact on premiums and claims depends on adoption and contract enforcement.
Swipe through stories, personalise your feed, and save articles for later — all on the app.
