Delhi High Court decided that Arvind Kejriwal’s excise-policy case will be heard by a different bench, following remarks from Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. Kejriwal framed the move as “truth” triumphing, citing Mahatma Gandhi’s satyagraha. AAP leaders called it a “big victory,” while Atishi alleged the judge has effectively recused. Sharma, however, said she was not recusing herself—she was transferring the matter after initiating criminal contempt proceedings over allegedly “vilifying” social media posts.
Delhi High Court judge Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma has initiated criminal contempt proceedings against Aam Aadmi Party leaders, alleging their social media posts “vilified” her in connection with the excise policy case. The judge said Arvind Kejriwal orchestrated a “calculated campaign” instead of pursuing legal remedies, warning that attempts to undermine court authority can’t hide behind free speech. Sharma also clarified she isn’t recusing herself; she will transfer the case, and the CBI’s discharge petition will be heard by another bench.
Your news, in seconds
Get the Beige app — every story in 60 words, updated hourly. Free on iOS & Android.
The Delhi High Court, led by Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma, has reportedly issued a notice of criminal contempt against AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal over “extremely defamatory” content circulated against her. The judge also indicated contempt proceedings may follow against other AAP figures, including Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak, warning that tolerating such attacks could lead to “anarchy.” The development emerged during CBI arguments challenging discharge orders in the Delhi excise policy case, amid a recusal row.
Swipe through stories, personalise your feed, and save articles for later — all on the app.
