The Karnataka High Court refused a wife’s request for higher maintenance despite her seeking an increase due to the husband’s one-acre land and possible inheritance from ancestral property. The court considered that the wife earned about Rs 1.5 lakh per month and that the husband’s available assets were limited, with the land mortgaged. It upheld the existing maintenance order.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court rejected an ancestral land claim even though the claimant showed possession, mutation in revenue records, and bank loan documents. The court held that mutation and loan records do not establish legal title. It said claimants must prove lawful ownership through registered deeds or other legally recognized documents, not merely lineage or long possession.
Your news, in seconds
Get the Beige app — every story in 60 words, updated hourly. Free on iOS & Android.
Courts are raising the bar for ancestral property claims, saying that simply labelling a property “ancestral” is not enough. Claimants must prove a traceable lineage from the original ancestor to themselves through documentary records such as revenue entries and proof of possession. Recent rulings stress that birthright alone does not establish ownership, and weak or missing chain-of-title evidence leads to dismissal.
Swipe through stories, personalise your feed, and save articles for later — all on the app.
